Key Dates

JUDGING PROCESS 2008
The judging process is based on international practice and
is internationally recognised as setting the highest possible
standards of fairness and impartiality.

The judging panel is led by the Chairman of the Jury. The
process of supervising the jury process is done by the
Overall Jury Coordinator.

  • Projects are randomly assigned to one or more judging groups (three judges, one of which is from industry), ensuring that no juror evaluates a project from their own school, college or university.
  • A number of projects (up to 15%) are marked by
    multiple juror groups to ensure fairness and impartiality in
    the judging process.
  • Jurors assign a mark out of 40 for each project. The marks
    from each juror group are averaged and a ranked listing of
    all projects generated.
  • The Chairman and Overall Jury Coordinator meet and decide on the number of finalists in each category, based on a percentage scale.
  • The Chairman, Overall and senior coordinators meet and decide on the winners in each category.

The judging decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

Feedback may be given to project authors upon request to the Overall Jury Coordinator.

Key Facts

 


 

 

 

 

 

Judging Criteria
Read about the
criteria the jurors
will use to judge
each project.

Jury Panel
View the jury panel
and read what their
comments are.

Judging Process
Read an overview
of the jury process
and how winning
projects are
decided.